Mesorat%20hashas for Chullin 217:18

<big><strong>מתני׳</strong></big> הכחל קורעו ומוציא את חלבו לא קרעו אינו עובר עליו

The words of R'Judah are acceptable in this but not in that'!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra n. 1. The view expressed there is that Rabbi agrees with R. Judah, that the entire contents are forbidden in the case where the pot was not stirred at once, but does not agree with him in the case where it was stirred at once. If this is Rabbi's true view then he should not have mentioned the Sages at all in his statement. The fact that the Sages are mentioned in Rabbi's statement indicates that they went so far as to permit even that Piece upon which the drop of milk fell, for they hold that when the forbidden substance is extracted the piece itself becomes permitted. The result of all this argument is to show that the law in the case when the forbidden substance can be considered extracted is a matter of dispute between Tannaim.');">⁹</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Chullin 217:18. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.